Semantic issues. I mean "employee," "shareholder," and "trader" mean nothing really. If the articles said their names, assuming they are worth knowing, or even the percentages of Enron they owned, assuming they didn't just own .000000004% through a trust fund,then it'd be...you know...believable. And you can't forget CNN's occasional bout of inaccurate reporting.
Yeah, it's a great story, just like when Al Gore won the presidency and those documents were found about Bush's military time. Can't forget about the interview Rather had with Saddam, either.